Getting latest data loading
Home / Blog / blog / How the UK election could still influence markets

This report is not a personal recommendation and does not take into account your personal circumstances or appetite for risk.

How the UK election could still influence markets

Another vote, another tough outcome for the UK electorate.

No outright winner came from the 8 June General Election. Instead, we came away with a hung parliament as all major UK political parties suffered some form of loss:

  • The Conservatives lost their parliamentary majority
  • The Labour Party gained the moral victory, but still came second to the Tories
  • The Liberal Democrats failed to see support for a second referendum
  • The Scottish National Party lost seats to Labour and the Conservatives, suggesting no 2nd Scottish independence referendum
  • UKIP won no seats at all

We are left with a confusing picture of government that hinges upon some form of agreement being struck between Theresa May’s Conservatives and the Northern Irish Democratic Union Party (DUP), an oft-controversial group known for its hard-line religious views.

blogWhat could possibly go wrong?

The confidence and supply agreement currently being negotiated – only used once in the past 50 years in 1977 and lasting only 18 months – means the DUP would be expected pledge support for major Conservative policies for minor kickbacks. Should the party decide to withdraw support May’s government, for whatever reason, the Tories would then be forced to form a minority government or a second general election would have to take place.

Even more pressing, should talks between the Tory Party and the DUP fail (note that the NI assembly itself has been out of action since January after Sinn Fein walked out on the power sharing agreement due to a DUP corrution scandal), and no official government is put in place, then the opposition – Labour – would have the opportunity to form a minority government.

Given the deeply complicated history of Northern Irish politics (the DUP only ratified the 1998 Good Friday agreement nine years later), this seems as though it could almost be an inevitability, especially with the touchy subject of the Northern Irish border needing to be settled before full negotiations can begin.

Furthermore, ongoing media reports of supposed Tory opposition to Theresa May’s leadership poses the potential for a leadership bid from within her own party. This would come about if 15%, or 48 Conservative MPs, tabled a motion of no confidence in the Prime Minister. The Conservatives would remain in power, but the government would be led by a different PM.

What could this mean for markets?

If there’s one thing that markets hate, it’s uncertainty.

The absence of a clear winner ahead of arguably the largest negotiating task for UK diplomats since the Second World War is far from what markets would have wanted. The subsequent Sterling weakness reflects this, although this offers a perverse boost for the the UK’s blue-chip UK 100 index. With the majority (>70%) of stocks on the index either reliant on the exporting of goods and services or reporting earnings in a foreign denomination, strength in the Euro and US dollar would have a positive impact.

Political uncertainty also plays badly for the Bank of England which, having tolerated the post-Brexit inflation overshoot, will come under increasing pressure to react as Real Wages decrease and CPI continues to accelerate. Analysts at HSBC and Deutsche Bank predict that this latest political drama could push back the BoE’s timetable to act until 2020. With the Wage/Inflation divergence looking set to continue, this could be particularly damaging for the average Brit’s wallet.

Should any of the aforementioned events come to fruition, it is likely that Sterling would fall further against both the Dollar and the Euro as uncertainty sees investors engage in risk-off trading, cutting riskier trades for ‘safe bets’ – defensive stocks or safe-haven assets such as Gold or the Japanese Yen.

The UK government hangs in the balance but, for the good of the markets, can a deal be hammered out behind closed doors? The clock is ticking.

———–

Henry Croft, Research Analyst, 13 June

« Back to Category

This research is produced by Accendo Markets Limited. Research produced and disseminated by Accendo Markets is classified as non-independent research, and is therefore a marketing communication. This investment research has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote its independence and it is not subject to the prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. This research does not constitute a personal recommendation or offer to enter into a transaction or an investment, and is produced and distributed for information purposes only.

Accendo Markets considers opinions and information contained within the research to be valid when published, and gives no warranty as to the investments referred to in this material. The income from the investments referred to may go down as well as up, and investors may realise losses on investments. The past performance of a particular investment is not necessarily a guide to its future performance. Prepared by Michael van Dulken, Head of Research

Comments are closed.

Spread bets and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage.
Spread bets and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 67% of retail investor accounts lose money when spread betting and/or trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how spread bets and CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
.